Your browser version is no longer supported, so you may experience issues while using this site.
Please upgrade to a current browser to enjoy the best experience.
-
The Safe Side | Issue 46
31/05/2023
This month, we cover a highly unusual prosecution taken by Police against two company officers for deliberately misleading inspectors during a WorkSafe investigation. We also look at the sentencing of two companies for failing to guard a void on the second floor of a building under construction as well as alerting building owners and property managers to WorkSafe’s recent safety alert on ensuring anchorages for rope access systems are re-certified and competently maintained. In addition, we have articles on the recent sentencing of KiwiRail after a shunter was injured on the Awatere ferry, calls for tougher measures to protect engineered stone workers, and a reminder about fire safety and emergency plans following the tragic fire in Wellington earlier this month.
Read more -
The Safe Side | Issue 45
30/04/2023
In this issue, we cover three prosecutions involving Councils. Two District Councils were sentenced for breaches of the Health and Safety at Work Act (HASWA) last month - one after the tragic death of a child; the other after a giant inflatable slide collapsed with a dozen people on it. On the other side of the coin, the Waikato Regional Council prosecuted a farming company for the unlawful discharge of dairy effluent under the Resource Management Act. In addition, we look at yet another WorkSafe prosecution for failing to manage machinery hazards and a UK case that resulted in a substantial £1 million fine after a worker was killed by malfunctioning equipment. Finally, we have an article on the new port sector health and safety plan that resulted from a novel collaboration between unions, ports and stevedoring companies.
Read more -
The Safe Side | Issue 44
30/03/2023
This month, we cover the third successful Court Ordered Enforceable Undertaking (COEU) imposed under the Health and Safety at Work Act. The COEU was proposed by the defendant as an alternative to paying a fine. We also look at a case where the failure to ensure workers wear eye protection has landed a company with a conviction and significant reparation orders. This follows a very similar prosecution of a fencing company last year. In addition, we have articles about a prosecution that arose from an incident where a new worker was struck on the head and shoulders by a skip bin, an eyewatering AU$1.5 million fine handed to an Australian energy company after the death of a worker at a power station and how two companies ended up paying $28,000 because neither one of them notified Maritime NZ that a worker had suffered minor burns.
Read more
No results found.
